OpenCampaign

Water

Community Voice

Water infrastructure investment

The early FY2027 budget agreement earmarks tens of millions for water: $35 million for a new revolving water loan program through the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, $10 million for water projects via REAP grants tied to that program, and $2 million for rural water district consolidations—highlighting rural and statewide water infrastructure as a concrete legislative priority.

How should Oklahoma fund water infrastructure and rural water systems?

Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.

How important is this to you?

Sources

NonDoc reporting on budget portals — https://nondoc.com/2026/04/01/oklahoma-legislature-strikes-early-fy-2027-budget-deal-teacher-pay-hike-cola
$35 million for a new revolving water loan program through the Oklahoma Water Resources Board; $10 million for water projects through Rural Economic Action Plan (REAP) grants tied to the other OWRB program; $2 million to OWRB for rural water district consolidations;
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Large ongoing state grants for water systems, prioritizing underserved rural communities
  2. Expand revolving loans and REAP-style grants above the FY2027 starter amounts
  3. Support the budget’s water loan, REAP, and consolidation funding as a balanced start
  4. Rely mainly on loans repaid by ratepayers with minimal new state appropriations
  5. Avoid new state water funds; leave infrastructure to local districts and private finance