State response to AI regulation
Governing’s 2026 state agenda preview flags federal frameworks on AI regulation as something states must respond to while managing other pressures. Pew also lists public views on AI-related policies as a competitive, unsettled area. North Dakota policymakers face choices on whether to wait for federal rules, craft state guardrails, or keep a light-touch approach for business and government use of AI.
What should North Dakota’s policy be toward artificial intelligence regulation?
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Governing (Jared Brey, Jule Pattison-Gordon, Carl Smith) — https://www.governing.com/politics/the-biggest-issues-to-watch-in-2026
States will be scrambling to manage new priorities and demands from Washington, tighten their belts in a tough budget cycle and respond to federal frameworks on AI regulation.
Pew Research Center — https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2026/07/23/as-the-2026-midterms-approach-economy-is-front-and-center
Policies related to AI | 22 | 23 | 51 | R+1
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Pass strong state AI safety, privacy, and worker rules beyond federal minimums
- Adopt consumer protections and transparency rules aligned with federal standards
- Monitor federal frameworks and regulate only clear, demonstrated harms
- Keep light-touch rules to attract AI investment and limit compliance costs
- Block most new AI rules and preempt local restrictions to maximize deregulation