OpenCampaign

2026 election issues

Election administration and trust

Coverage of 2026 politics highlights heightened scrutiny, misinformation, and harassment directed at election administrators, plus presidential and public claims about election fairness and security even where evidence of widespread problems is disputed. States must run midterms under that pressure. North Dakota election officials and voters face the same national climate of contested trust, resource strain, and debates over rules and certification.

How should North Dakota handle election administration and public trust in 2026 elections?

How important is this to you?

Sources

Governing (Jared Brey, Jule Pattison-Gordon, Carl Smith) — https://www.governing.com/politics/the-biggest-issues-to-watch-in-2026
With control of Congress on the line in the midterm elections, election administrators expect the scrutiny, misinformation and harassment that has engulfed their work in recent years to increase.
Encyclopaedia Britannica — https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-key-issues-in-the-2026-midterms
Additionally, Trump has raised concerns about the fairness and security of elections, despite evidence that
Center for American Progress — https://www.americanprogress.org/issues
Decertifying a Voting System Takes More Than a Presidential Declaration
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Expand voting access and fund administrators while rejecting baseless fraud narratives
  2. Improve access and security together and publicly counter misinformation with facts
  3. Maintain current rules, protect workers from harassment, and communicate neutrally
  4. Tighten ID and audit rules further to address fairness concerns even if access narrows
  5. Overhaul systems toward stricter controls and allow wider challenges to certification