OpenCampaign

Political Extremisim

Political polarization and political violence

Freedom House’s 2026 U.S. report describes rising offline political violence across the spectrum, online threats tied to political speech, and doxing, with state laws on doxing criticized by some as speech-restrictive. Polarization also shapes primaries and governance. North Dakota, like other states, must address safety for public officials and residents while weighing free-speech limits.

How should North Dakota address political polarization, threats, and political violence?

How important is this to you?

Sources

Freedom House — https://freedomhouse.org/country/united-states/freedom-world/2026
Meanwhile, the recent rise in offline political violence—against targets from across the political spectrum—has magnified the impact of online threats linked to political speech. These problems have been compounded by the practice of doxing, the nonconsensual release of individuals’ personal information.
Freedom House — https://freedomhouse.org/country/united-states/freedom-world/2026
Although several states have passed legislation designed to prevent and punish doxing, the laws have drawn criticism for allegedly infringing on free-speech rights.
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Strengthen hate-crime and anti-doxing laws even if some political speech is chilled
  2. Fund threat monitoring and narrowly ban true threats and nonconsensual doxing
  3. Enforce existing assault and harassment laws equally without new speech rules
  4. Prioritize free-speech protections and only prosecute clear violent conduct
  5. Roll back doxing/speech restrictions and focus solely on physical violence prosecutions