Public safety and crime
Property crime and auto break-ins fell substantially, improving public mood, yet police staffing, overtime, cameras/drones, and enforcement remain Board priorities. Moderates generally back more police resources while progressives emphasize reform; Sheriff overtime and jail staffing also draw scrutiny.
What should San Francisco prioritize for public safety and policing?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
SF Chronicle — https://sfchronicle.com/sf/article/supervisors-voting-coalitions-politics-20892175.php
a more cohesive moderate/YIMBY/centrist bloc (supporting housing of various types + police resources) holds a majority
Mission Local — https://missionlocal.org/2026/10/s-f-supervisors-press-city-on-drug-markets-are-the-crackdowns-working/
Priorities include police staffing/funding/overtime, tools like cameras/drones (with civil liberties caveats)
GrowSF — https://growsf.org/pulse/
Concerns about property crime, homelessness, and mental health eased notably year-over-year (crime dropped sharply overall)
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Reduce police funding and end tools like drones/cameras in favor of community alternatives and reform
- Hold police staffing steady while expanding civilian responders and strict oversight of new surveillance
- Maintain current staffing with selective overtime, cameras, and balanced civil-liberties safeguards
- Increase police hiring, overtime, and technology to sustain crime drops and visible street presence
- Maximize police budgets, surveillance, and enforcement with minimal restrictions on tactics or overtime