Muni funding shortfall
Muni faces a fiscal cliff with hundreds of millions in shortfalls for operations, prompting proposals such as a tiered parcel tax. This intersects with broader budget pressures, street conditions, and transit reliability amid affordability and recovery goals.
How should San Francisco fund Muni operations amid its fiscal cliff?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Mission Local — https://missionlocal.org/2026/05/explore-san-francisco-2025-2026-budget/
Muni faces a fiscal cliff (hundreds of millions shortfall), prompting a proposed tiered parcel tax (Prop H or similar) for operations
SF Examiner — https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/politics/sf-budget-daniel-lurie-spending-cuts/article_0dc87a85-3c28-42ad-a8ca-562645854d88.html
impacts from ballot measures that lock in spending or cut revenues
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Fund Muni fully via progressive taxes and free or low fares without service cuts or parcel taxes
- Support a parcel tax plus state/federal aid while keeping fares low and protecting equity routes
- Mix modest fare increases, a limited parcel tax, and efficiency reforms to close the gap
- Raise fares, cut low-ridership service, and use targeted taxes only as a last resort for core lines
- Shrink Muni to profitable routes, avoid new taxes, and rely on private options and fare revenue