Pushback against federal executive actions
Rhode Island political leaders and academics are debating whether the state should actively resist federal executive actions under the Trump administration, including rollbacks of social safety net programs, termination of renewable energy projects, and requests for sensitive voter data. University of Rhode Island political science professor Emily Lynch argues states should push back, while this stance reflects a broader national debate about state versus federal authority.
Should Rhode Island actively push back against federal executive actions that affect state programs and voter data?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Emily Lynch, University of Rhode Island — https://heyrhody.com/stories/ris-next-governor-to-face-new-and-familiar-challenges,109822
States should continue to push back against President Trump's executive actions to roll back social safety net programs, end renewable energy projects, and retrieve voter files with sensitive voter information.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Rhode Island should aggressively resist all federal rollbacks through legislation, litigation, and refusing to comply.
- The state should formally oppose federal actions that harm Rhode Islanders and join multi-state legal challenges.
- Rhode Island should engage the federal government diplomatically while protecting state programs where legally possible.
- The state should comply with federal directives while advocating for change through elected representatives in Congress.
- Rhode Island should fully cooperate with federal executive actions; states should not obstruct the federal government.