Infrastructure investment bonds
Governor McKee proposed a $600 million bond package for Rhode Island — the largest in state history — to fund infrastructure, economic development, education, and housing. The House budget incorporated this historic bond proposal. The $600 million figure is $200 million more than the next highest bond package ever approved by voters, signaling a major push to modernize state infrastructure but also raising questions about long-term debt obligations.
Should Rhode Island approve a historic $600 million bond package for infrastructure, housing, and education?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Totaling $600 million, the governor's proposed bond referenda would be the largest in the state's history, $200 million more than the next highest bond package approved by voters.
Governor Dan McKee announced a $600 million budget proposal to build or expand critical infrastructure to support economic development, education, and housing.
2026 Budget puts more money back in Rhode Islanders' pockets, keeps Rhode Island building with a historic bond proposal.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Support the full $600M bond package and push for even more investment in public infrastructure and green transit.
- Approve the $600M bond package as proposed; the long-term economic benefits outweigh the added debt obligations.
- Approve a scaled-down bond package focused on the highest-priority projects to balance investment with fiscal caution.
- Reject the bond package; Rhode Island should fund infrastructure through the operating budget, not new long-term debt.
- Oppose any new state bonds given projected deficits; require private investment for infrastructure improvements instead.