Road infrastructure and pothole funding
Roads, potholes, and infrastructure are top resident complaints and budget priorities in Indianapolis. The city has tripled road patching funds and seeks state grant matches, but a major flashpoint is the council override of the mayor's veto on vehicle/excise and wheel tax hikes to accelerate repairs and fund local matches, versus preferences for other revenue sources.
How should Indianapolis fund major road repairs, pothole fixes, and infrastructure upgrades?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
City-County Council — https://www.wthr.com/article/news/local/indys-19-billion-budget-promises-more-for-roads-as-drivers-prepare-to-pay-more-indianapolis-mayor-joe-hogsett-indiana/531-388289e7-56dc-4acc-b92e-51f2ba67ff8a
Council passed (and overrode Hogsett’s veto of) significant vehicle/excise surtax and wheel tax hikes (e.g., passenger vehicles to a flat ~$100 from ~$20 average) to fund local matches for state road money and accelerate repairs. Hogsett preferred other sources
Mayor Joe Hogsett — https://www.wrtv.com/news/politics/indianapolis-mayor-proposes-nearly-1-9-billion-budget-for-2027/
The 2027 proposal heavily boosts the Department of Public Works (DPW) for roads, bridges, greenways, stormwater, and equipment, plus a new operations garage. big growth from ~$100 million in road funding via state matching grants.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Fund roads mainly via higher progressive income or wealth taxes plus large public bonds for equity
- Support vehicle/wheel tax hikes and state matches to rapidly expand DPW road and bridge work
- Use mixed state grants, modest fees, and existing budget reallocations without major new taxes
- Limit tax hikes, prefer stormwater/income options, and slow projects to protect driver affordability
- Reject local vehicle taxes entirely and cut other spending rather than raise any driver fees