ICE cooperation and immigration response
Indianapolis officials face criticism over city/county cooperation levels with ICE amid enforcement surges, including the sheriff's detainee housing agreement. Faith leaders and some candidates have spoken out against the response, while state attorney general pressure exists on non-cooperation; this has factored into budget and political debates.
How should Indianapolis handle cooperation with ICE and local immigration enforcement issues?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
80 faith leaders — https://www.indystar.com/story/news/local/indianapolis/2026/09/03/80-faith-leaders-criticize-hogsett-indy-officials-on-ice-surge-response/91560228007/
Criticism of city/county cooperation levels amid enforcement surges; faith leaders and candidates have spoken out.
Councilors and advocates — https://www.wthr.com/article/news/local/indy-city-county-council-approves-17-billion-2026-budget-tense-debate-indianapolis-money-taxes/531-e95bea3c-283b-40b6-b0b0-e7ab96a7cd92
Sheriff’s ICE detainee housing agreement has drawn sharp criticism from some councilors and advocates (with state AG pressure on non-cooperation elsewhere); it factored into budget opposition.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Declare sanctuary policies, end all ICE detainee housing, and block any local-federal immigration cooperation
- Limit cooperation, terminate the housing agreement, and prioritize community trust over enforcement aid
- Maintain existing limited agreements while monitoring legal and community impacts carefully
- Continue and potentially expand sheriff ICE housing and information-sharing for public safety
- Fully align with federal ICE surges, maximize detention support, and reject any non-cooperation limits