OpenCampaign

Public Safety

Community Voice

Coastal public-safety risk on PCH

Worsening erosion in the Palisades burn zone threatens the roadway embankment supporting PCH, raising risks of failure during high surf, rainfall, or El Niño storms. Malibu has conducted field observations, emergency coordination, and briefings while Caltrans installs temporary barriers and begins slope and seawall work; officials emphasize protecting travelers and utilities beneath the highway.

What level of urgency and resources should go to preventing PCH roadway failure from coastal erosion in Malibu?

Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.

How important is this to you?

Sources

City of Malibu — https://malibucity.org/PCHErosionResponse
While Caltrans has taken important interim steps to protect the roadway, the City continues to urge the agency to move quickly on permanent stabilization measures to protect public safety and critical infrastructure.
City Manager Joe Irvin — http://www.malibucity.org/m/newsflash/Home/Detail/2128
The City of Malibu and Caltrans have been working side-by-side to evaluate conditions and coordinate the next steps to protect public safety.
City of Malibu — https://www.sfgate.com/la/article/pacific-coast-highway-malibu-22383912.php
The city says it’s “done everything within its authority” to document conditions and work with partners to permanently stabilize PCH, including completing field observations with Caltrans, monitoring impacted parcels and briefing the Governor’s Office of Los Angeles Recovery.
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Declare highest emergency priority with major public funding for immediate permanent protection and traveler safeguards
  2. Push rapid permanent stabilization timelines and enhanced monitoring before winter to reduce collapse and closure risks
  3. Maintain interim barriers and steady multi-agency work while tracking storm forecasts
  4. Emphasize quicker tactical engineering and traffic controls over longer collaborative planning cycles
  5. Accept more limited intervention and seasonal risk management rather than large new permanent projects

Wildfire emergency and relief

Malibu city government has highlighted wildfire emergency declarations alongside local elections focused on community issues, while regional coverage notes disputes over the pace of wildfire relief and state plans centered on fire mitigation so communities can reduce risk and remain insured.

What should be the priority for wildfire emergency response and relief affecting Malibu?

Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.

How important is this to you?

Sources

City of Malibu — https://www.malibucity.org/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=2108
the general election for seats on the City Council is nonpartisan and focused on issues that matter to our local community." Declares Emergency for Wildfire
Los Angeles Times / Gov. Newsom context — https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2026-01-03/la-on-the-record-six-political-stories-in-2026
Trump arrives in Los Angeles for GOP fundraiser. Newsom bemoans ‘overdue’ wildfire relief
Senator Ben Allen — https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2026-01-03/la-on-the-record-six-political-stories-in-2026
Senator Allen has put his money on fire mitigation and bringing stakeholders together in communities up and down the state to reduce their risk and stay insured.
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Scale up state/federal relief funds and climate adaptation spending for burned and high-risk communities
  2. Speed wildfire relief while funding community mitigation so residents can stay and remain insured
  3. Coordinate local emergency declarations with targeted mitigation and phased recovery aid
  4. Focus on local preparedness and private rebuilding with limited new permanent spending programs
  5. Minimize state intervention; emphasize personal responsibility and local self-reliance after fires