Cost of living and affordability
Affordability is expected to remain a dominant California political message into 2026, with pressure on leaders to deliver cost-of-living relief through structural reform on housing supply, energy infrastructure, and service delivery rather than subsidies alone; national surveys similarly rank housing, goods, and related costs among top concerns.
What approach should Malibu-area and state leaders prioritize to ease the cost-of-living burden?
How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue
No quiz question covers this exact issue — showing responses to the closest one, Business and Consumers.
28% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).
- Liberal5%
- Lean liberal22%
- Moderate30%
- Lean conservative28%
- Conservative15%
Where do you stand?
What approach should Malibu-area and state leaders prioritize to ease the cost-of-living burden?
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Expect affordability to remain a dominant political message in 2026. Republicans will frame the crisis as a failure of progressive governance, while Democrats will face pressure to deliver real cost-of-living relief — not just through subsidies, but through longer-term structural reform on housing supply, energy infrastructure, and service delivery.
Roughly seven-in-ten adults (71%) say they are very concerned about the cost of health care. Most say the same about the prices of food and consumer goods (66%) and housing (62%).
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Expand subsidies, price controls, and public investment to directly lower household costs
- Focus on structural reforms plus targeted relief for housing, energy, and essential services
- Mix modest aid with incremental supply-side and infrastructure fixes
- Emphasize deregulation, energy production, and spending restraint over new subsidies
- Slash taxes and government programs; let markets alone reset prices and wages