Oregon criminal justice reform and recidivism
Oregon has undertaken substantial criminal justice reforms including reducing mandatory minimums and expanding diversion programs. Critics argue reforms have contributed to rising property crime and public safety concerns, while supporters say more investment in reentry services is needed.
Should Oregon continue criminal justice reform or strengthen sentencing and enforcement?
How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue
No quiz question covers this exact issue — showing responses to the closest one, Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.
32% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).
- Liberal20%
- Lean liberal28%
- Moderate26%
- Lean conservative14%
- Conservative12%
Where do you stand?
Should Oregon continue criminal justice reform or strengthen sentencing and enforcement?
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
https://www.governor.ny.gov/programs/2026-state-state
New initiatives will help get illegal guns off our streets and take on emerging threats.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Expand restorative justice, end mandatory minimums, and invest heavily in reentry, housing, and job training.
- Continue reducing incarceration for nonviolent offenses while funding mental health and addiction treatment.
- Balance reform with accountability: fund both diversion programs and adequate law enforcement resources.
- Restore tougher sentencing for repeat property crime offenders and increase police staffing in high-crime areas.
- Reverse recent reforms, impose stricter mandatory sentences, and prioritize incarceration to deter crime.