OpenCampaign

Taxes

Community Voice

NJ structural budget deficit

New Jersey faces an ongoing structural deficit in which annual revenues fall short of expenditures. In FY2026, the gap was estimated at $1.5 billion, and the state's cash reserves have declined from $10 billion in FY2024 to a projected $6.7 billion. Gov. Sherrill's FY2027 proposal aimed to close a $1.2 billion structural deficit through a combination of $2 billion in program cuts and $700 million in corporate tax loophole closures. Policy analysts at NJ Policy Perspective warned that without sustainable new revenue sources, fiscal instability will worsen.

How should New Jersey address its ongoing structural budget deficit?

Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.

How important is this to you?

Sources

Peter Chen, New Jersey Policy Perspective — https://www.njpp.org/publications/report/five-budget-time-bombs-facing-the-next-governor
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2026, New Jersey will generate $1.5 billion less in revenue than it needs to cover expenses. As a result, the state will have to spend down its cash reserves, which have fallen each year from $10 billion in FY 2024 to less than $7 billion projected for FY 2026.
Gov. Mikie Sherrill — https://www.facebook.com/OCPoliceBlotter/posts/new-jersey-under-mikie-sherrills-new-plan/1694750782660718
Her proposed budget closes a $1.2 billion structural deficit through $2 billion in program cuts and $700 million in corporate tax loophole closures.
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Close the deficit entirely by raising taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations, not through spending cuts.
  2. Use a balanced mix of new revenue (closing corporate loopholes) and targeted spending cuts to eliminate the deficit.
  3. Gradually draw down reserves while the economy grows, avoiding abrupt tax hikes or major cuts.
  4. Close the deficit primarily through spending cuts, with minimal new taxes or fees on businesses.
  5. Eliminate the deficit entirely through deep spending reductions; no new taxes or fees of any kind.

Corporate tax deductions and employer Medicaid fee

Sherrill’s budget framework limits certain pandemic-era corporate tax loss write-offs and proposes a new per-employee assessment on large employers whose workers rely on Medicaid. Business groups are expected to scrutinize these changes while supporters frame them as fairness and deficit-closing measures.

Should New Jersey limit corporate tax deductions and add fees on large employers tied to Medicaid use?

Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.

How important is this to you?

Sources

Jersey Vindicator — https://jerseyvindicator.org/2026/03/12/explained-whats-in-gov-mikie-sherrills-first-new-jersey-budget
Corporate tax deductions: limits placed on certain pandemic-era loss write-offs. Medicaid employer fee: large employers whose workers rely on Medicaid would pay a new per-employee assessment. Business groups are also expected to scrutinize the proposal to limit certain corporate tax deductions and impose a new fee on large employers whose workers rely on Medicaid.
https://www.facebook.com/OCPoliceBlotter/posts/new-jersey-under-mikie-sherrills-new-plan/1694750782660718
Her proposed budged closes a $1.2 billion structural deficit through $2 billion in program cuts and $700 million in corporate tax loophole
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Go further with higher corporate taxes and stronger employer responsibility for worker health coverage
  2. Support the proposed deduction limits and Medicaid employer fee as fair deficit-reduction tools
  3. Study the fee and deduction changes carefully and adopt only narrowly tailored versions
  4. Reject the new employer Medicaid fee and keep most existing corporate deduction rules
  5. Eliminate the proposed fees and expand corporate deductions to improve the business climate