OpenCampaign

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Hispanic political representation and influence

Arizona's rapidly growing Hispanic population — particularly Latinas increasingly heading households and entering the workforce — is reshaping the state's political landscape ahead of 2026. University of Arizona research highlights how Hispanic voters are becoming a decisive force in statewide races, prompting both parties to compete for their support on economic, education, and immigration issues.

How should Arizona's political institutions better reflect and serve the state's growing Hispanic community?

How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue

32% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).

  1. Liberal20%
  2. Lean liberal28%
  3. Moderate26%
  4. Lean conservative14%
  5. Conservative12%

High-priority share over time

32%201629%201734%201934%202043%202145%202235%202328%202439%202543%2026

The high-priority share has ranged 28–45% since 2016. Election-year cohorts skew casual and under-rate every issue, so the dips around 2020 and 2024 partly reflect who took the quiz, not a shift in opinion.

Where do you stand?

How should Arizona's political institutions better reflect and serve the state's growing Hispanic community?

How important is this to you?

Sources

University of Arizona political scientist (quoted in UA News)https://news.arizona.edu/news/arizonas-growing-political-influence-explained-u-political-scientist
Latinas are increasingly heads of households. When we look at the economic data, there are higher levels of engagement in the labor market, and they are starting to run more and more households for the first time.
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Pass proactive representation policies, fund Spanish-language civic outreach, and address systemic barriers to voting.
  2. Invest in voter registration, language access, and culturally responsive services to better serve Hispanic Arizonans.
  3. Ensure equal access to services and voting for all Arizonans without race- or ethnicity-specific programs.
  4. Focus on economic policies that benefit all Arizonans; specific ethnic outreach programs are unnecessary.
  5. Government should be ethnicity-neutral; targeted programs for any specific group are inappropriate.

Race and ethnicity preferences in government

Proposition 142 would prohibit Arizona government from requiring individuals to endorse preferential treatment or discrimination based on race or ethnicity, touching education governance, affirmative action, and constitutional rights debates.

How should Arizona handle race- or ethnicity-based preferential treatment policies?

How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue

32% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).

  1. Liberal20%
  2. Lean liberal28%
  3. Moderate26%
  4. Lean conservative14%
  5. Conservative12%

High-priority share over time

32%201629%201734%201934%202043%202145%202235%202328%202439%202543%2026

The high-priority share has ranged 28–45% since 2016. Election-year cohorts skew casual and under-rate every issue, so the dips around 2020 and 2024 partly reflect who took the quiz, not a shift in opinion.

Where do you stand?

How should Arizona handle race- or ethnicity-based preferential treatment policies?

How important is this to you?

Sources

Ballotpediahttps://ballotpedia.org/Arizona_elections,_2026
Prohibit the government from requiring an individual to endorse preferential treatment toward or discrimination against an individual on the basis of race or ethnicity
Positions on this issue  ·  liberal → conservative
  1. Actively expand race-conscious programs in education, contracting, and hiring to address equity
  2. Allow targeted preferential policies where data shows ongoing disparities need remedy
  3. Permit diversity goals but ban rigid quotas or compelled personal endorsements
  4. Prohibit government-required preferences or compelled statements on race-based treatment
  5. Ban all race- or ethnicity-based preferences and related trainings in public institutions