Civil liberties under federal executive power
National and local civil liberties concerns have intensified in Alabama as the Trump administration expands executive authority, deploys federal agencies against political opponents, and reshapes government institutions. Alabamians are debating the appropriate limits of presidential and executive power on civil liberties.
Should Alabama take steps to protect its residents' civil liberties from potential federal overreach?
How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue
32% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).
- Liberal20%
- Lean liberal28%
- Moderate26%
- Lean conservative14%
- Conservative12%
High-priority share over time
The high-priority share has ranged 28–45% since 2016. Election-year cohorts skew casual and under-rate every issue, so the dips around 2020 and 2024 partly reflect who took the quiz, not a shift in opinion. Updated 21 Sep 2026.
Where do you stand?
Should Alabama take steps to protect its residents' civil liberties from potential federal overreach?
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Trump is attempting to dismantle checks on his power, capture the machinery of government, and weaponize it against his enemies, making the United States the principal source of global risk in 2026.
The Trump Administration Has Created a De Facto Licensing System for Frontier AI Models.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Pass strong state civil liberties protections and actively challenge federal overreach in court.
- Establish a state civil liberties review board to monitor and report on federal agency actions.
- Rely on existing federal and state laws; intervene only when specific violations are documented.
- Support expanded federal executive authority as necessary to address national security threats.
- Fully back the president's executive actions; state government should not challenge federal power.