Campaign money and donation transparency
Money in politics is salient for Kentucky voters right now: the state's 2026 primaries included "expensive and contentious races" in Northern Kentucky's 4th Congressional District and the U.S. Senate contest, per Kentucky Lantern, and 2027 gubernatorial candidates are already fundraising. At the federal level, Rep. James Comer's ongoing investigation into ActBlue and campaign finance transparency has raised questions about donation practices in several states, as noted by WUKY.
How should campaign finance be regulated in the races Kentuckians vote in?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
WUKY — https://www.facebook.com/wuky.radio/posts/while-most-of-us-are-contemplating-this-upcoming-election-kentuckys-gubernatoria/1713709887420739
James Comer's ongoing investigation into ActBlue and campaign finance transparency, which has raised questions about donation practices in several states.
Kentucky Lantern — https://kentuckylantern.com/2026/05/20/unusually-high-number-of-county-judge-executives-lost-primary-elections-across-kentucky
Kentuckians voted for local elected officials in primary elections alongside other expensive and contentious races in the 4th Congressional District in Northern Kentucky.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Move toward publicly financed campaigns so candidates don't depend on big donors at all.
- Impose stricter donation limits and real-time disclosure for platforms like ActBlue and WinRed.
- Keep the current system but enforce existing disclosure rules more consistently.
- Treat political donations as protected speech and loosen contribution limits.
- Eliminate donation limits entirely; transparency through disclosure alone is sufficient.