Abortion access amid state-federal conflict
Abortion access is one of four key issues at the forefront of California public conversation and a significant point of conflict between the state and federal government. Californians’ views on abortion are intertwined with broader partisan and presidential politics that shape local and state policy debates.
What should California’s policy be on abortion access given ongoing state-federal tensions?
How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue
32% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).
- Liberal41%
- Lean liberal14%
- Moderate13%
- Lean conservative6%
- Conservative26%
High-priority share over time
The high-priority share has ranged 11–53% since 2016. Election-year cohorts skew casual and under-rate every issue, so the dips around 2020 and 2024 partly reflect who took the quiz, not a shift in opinion.
Where do you stand?
What should California’s policy be on abortion access given ongoing state-federal tensions?
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
We have enough data to explore four key issues that have been at the forefront of the public conversation: the size of state government, the benefits and costs of immigrants and immigration, California’s role in climate change mitigation, and abortion access. All these issues have also been points of significant conflict between the state and federal government
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Expand state-funded access, shield providers, and fund out-of-state patients aggressively
- Protect and codify broad abortion access as a fundamental state right
- Keep current state protections without major new expansions or restrictions
- Allow more limits after early pregnancy and reduce state subsidies for abortion
- Align with restrictive federal approaches and curtail state abortion accommodations