OpenCampaign

Democracy

Election administration scrutiny

With 2026 midterms underway, election administrators face heightened scrutiny, misinformation, and harassment. Illinois has already seen federal litigation over voter data, making election administration integrity and security a live local issue.

How should Illinois handle election administration amid federal pressure and public scrutiny?

How OpenCampaign quiz-takers stand on this issue

No quiz question covers this exact issue β€” showing responses to the closest one, Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.

32% call it a high-priority issue (rating it 7+ out of 10).

  1. Liberal20%
  2. Lean liberal28%
  3. Moderate26%
  4. Lean conservative14%
  5. Conservative12%

Where do you stand?

How should Illinois handle election administration amid federal pressure and public scrutiny?

How important is this to you?

Sources

Mitchell Armentrout / WBEZ Chicago β€” https://www.wbez.org/politics
Federal judge tosses Trump administration lawsuit seeking full access to Illinois voter rolls
Governing β€” https://www.governing.com/politics/the-biggest-issues-to-watch-in-2026
With control of Congress on the line in the midterm elections, election administrators expect the scrutiny, misinformation and harassment that has engulfed their work in recent years to increase.
Positions on this issue  Β·  liberal → conservative
  1. Maximize state/local control and shield officials from federal interference
  2. Strengthen state authority while adding transparent audits and anti-harassment protections
  3. Maintain current rules with modest bipartisan transparency improvements
  4. Increase federal standards and oversight to harden election security
  5. Mandate full federal access and strict national election controls