Untreated mental health and addiction capacity
Untreated mental health issues are rated extremely/very serious by 71% of voters and are heavily intertwined with homelessness and substance use. Debates focus on treatment capacity, integration with homelessness response, diversion versus enforcement, and Lurie initiatives emphasizing treatment and accountability. Budget pressures from federal cuts affect continuity of healthcare and behavioral health supports.
How should the city expand or reform mental health and addiction treatment?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
GrowSF — https://growsf.org/pulse/
untreated mental health issues (71%). Concerns about crime have eased significantly as rates have fallen, while support for more housing production is high.
Mayor Lurie / SF.gov — https://www.sf.gov/news-mayor-lurie-presents-responsible-budget-strengthening-social-safety-net-in-response-to-significant-federal-cuts-advancing-san-franciscos-economic-recovery
Behavioral health and substance use are heavily intertwined. Lurie’s “Breaking the Cycle” and related initiatives emphasize treatment and accountability.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Massively expand voluntary community treatment and housing-first without mandates
- Increase treatment beds and outpatient care with strong voluntary outreach focus
- Build capacity for both voluntary care and targeted conservatorship where needed
- Expand mandated treatment options and accountability linked to housing and services
- Prioritize court-ordered treatment and reduce funding for purely voluntary programs