Youth voting age (Vote 16)
Culver City has debated whether 16- and 17-year-olds should be allowed to vote in local elections. Student advocates argue that local decisions on schools, gun control, and the environment directly affect them and that California’s required high-school government classes leave them as prepared as many adults.
Should Culver City allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in local elections?
Tap a point along the line below to show where you stand.
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
16- and 17-year-olds in Culver City argued that local issues are impactful enough in their lives to deserve a voice, with decisions related to schools, gun control, and the environment highlighted by student advocates.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Yes, fully extend local voting rights to 16- and 17-year-olds immediately
- Pilot youth voting in school-board or advisory races first, then expand
- Undecided or need more local study before changing the voting age
- Keep the voting age at 18; civic education is enough without ballots
- Oppose any lowering of the voting age; only adults should decide local policy