Campaign finance reform ballot measure
Michigan voters in 2026 are deciding on a citizen-initiated ballot measure (Proposal 2) that would prohibit regulated electric and gas utilities, large government contractors (with over $250,000 annually in contracts), and those with substantial connections to them from making direct or indirect campaign contributions to candidates for public office. The measure also expands campaign finance regulations to additional types of political communications. Money in politics has been a top issue in both the Democratic U.S. Senate primary and among Republican voters.
Should Michigan ban campaign contributions from regulated utilities and large government contractors?
How important is this to you?
✓ You told us where you stand
Sources
Prohibit certain organizations and individuals—such as regulated electric and gas utilities, contractors with over $250,000 annually in government contracts, and people and organizations with substantial connections to those utilities or contractors—from making direct or indirect contributions to those who run for office.
The second ballot measure is known as Michiganders for Money Out of Politics (often abbreviated as MMOP). This is a proposed law — not a constitutional amendment — that would stop utility companies and large government contractors from donating to political campaigns for officials who could impact their contracts.
Money in politics has been a top issue in the Democratic U.S. Senate primary and concerns have also been raised by Republican Perry Johnson.
Banning Corporate Money in Politics, Ending Gerrymandering, Supreme Court Reform, Abolishing the Filibuster, Making Voting Easier.
Positions on this issue · liberal → conservative
- Fully support the ban and expand it to cover all corporate and PAC donations to any political campaign in Michigan.
- Support Proposal 2 as written — utilities and large contractors should not donate to candidates who oversee them.
- Support the concept but prefer broader campaign finance reform through the legislature rather than a ballot measure.
- Oppose the measure as overly broad; existing disclosure rules are sufficient to address conflicts of interest.
- Oppose the measure entirely — it restricts free speech rights and unfairly singles out certain industries.